Observing the Arctic Clouds at Scale
We fund and coordinate the science, governance, and partnerships needed to evaluate targeted cloud observation across the Arctic.
Overview
This grant funds field observation programmes that improve our understanding of Arctic cloud behaviour at scale. Placeholder copy for build purposes.
A second paragraph to test spacing and typography within the rich text block.
Scope
Proposals should focus on observational methods, instrumentation, and data infrastructure. Placeholder copy. Successful projects will demonstrate clear methodology and a credible path to publishable results.
Eligibility
Open to independent researchers, university teams, and research institutions. Placeholder copy describing eligibility criteria, institutional requirements, and geographic considerations.
- Bullet item 1
- Bullet item 2
- Bullet item 3
Review
All proposals undergo dual-anonymous peer review by the Scientific Advisory Board. Placeholder copy for the review section.
Timeline
RFP opens June 2026. Applications close August 2026. Decisions announced October 2026. Funded research begins January 2027. Placeholder copy.
Resources
Applicants should review the full RFP document, budget guidelines, and budget template before submitting. Placeholder copy.
Research scope
Every proposal requires careful attention to the fundamentals. These elements form the foundation of a strong application.
Governance framework alignment
Clear research boundaries
Documented eligibility status
Timeline awareness and planning
Eligibility
Open to independent researchers, university teams, and research institutions. Placeholder copy describing eligibility criteria, institutional requirements, and geographic considerations.
- Bullet item 1
- Bullet item 2
- Bullet item 3
Example research directions
Open to independent researchers, university teams, and research institutions. Placeholder copy describing eligibility criteria, institutional requirements, and geographic considerations.
- Bullet item 1
- Bullet item 2
- Bullet item 3
Example research directions
Placeholder copy outlining example research directions the initiative would welcome, including remote sensing approaches, in-situ measurement campaigns, and data assimilation methods.
Expected outcomes
Placeholder copy describing expected outcomes, including open datasets, peer-reviewed publications, and contributions to the wider observation network.
How we evaluate proposals
- Scientific merit and methodology
- Team capability and track record
- Feasibility within budget and timeline
- Data sharing and openness commitments
- Alignment with initiative principles
Our review process
The review process for our research is thorough and collaborative, ensuring that every aspect is scrutinized by experts in the field. Each submission undergoes a rigorous evaluation by our Scientific Advisory Board.
Dual-anonymous peer review
We produce decision-grade evidence and scientific benchmarks. ASI is not advocating for deployment of any technology—we are building the basis for informed decisions.
Who reviews
Each proposal is reviewed by [X] independent scientists drawn from outside ASI's SAB to avoid conflicts of interest. The SAB then provides programme-level oversight of final funding decisions.
Appeals
Decisions can be appealed within 30 days of notification. See our appeals policy for details.
Budget
Placeholder text on the funding range available, typical award sizes, and how budgets are assessed.
Funding range
Placeholder text on the funding range available, typical award sizes, and how budgets are assessed.
What we fund
Placeholder text on eligible costs such as fieldwork, instrumentation, data infrastructure, and personnel.
What we don’t fund
Placeholder text on ineligible costs such as institutional overheads above an agreed cap or unrelated equipment.
What you’ll deliver
- Interim progress reports at agreed milestones
- Open access datasets with documentation
- A final technical report
- At least one peer-reviewed publication
- Participation in the annual review meeting
Resources for applicants
Everything you need to prepare a strong application.
Application Instructions
We fund decision-grade science. Applications are open to scientists at institutions and independent researchers alike.
RFP opens
We publish scoped opportunities designed by the SAB.
You eapply
Applications will need to complete an application form, including the submission of a CV and a budget justification.
We oreview
Proposals are assessed against published criteria.We expect to see that the proposers have permission and access to the facilities that they will use and proposers will need to articulate how long it will take to perform their work, who will perform the work, and the steps required to perform the experiments.
Funded research obegins
Milestone-driven, with regular reporting.
FAQ
Answers to any questions you might have left. For anything else:
info@asi.org
Who do I contact with questions?
Placeholder answer with contact details for questions not covered here.
Can we submit multiple proposals?
Placeholder answer covering whether teams can submit more than one proposal.
What can the budget cover?
Placeholder answer covering what costs the budget can and cannot include.
How does the review process work?
Placeholder answer covering how the review process works and how long decisions take.
Who can apply for this grant?
Placeholder answer explaining whether the grant is open to applicants outside specific regions.
What is ASI?
Placeholder answer explaining what ASI is and what the initiative funds.
Ready to apply?
Whether you are a scientist, funder, or policy maker, we want to work together.
