Funding opportunities
Coming Soon!
Projects making real progress
See what our researchers are building in the field
Ice sheet modeling
One-line summary
Key facts row: funding range, deadline, expected duration, eligibility
Brief description (2 to 3 lines)
How our funding works
RFP opens
You apply
We review
Funded research begins
Who can apply
Most awards go to scientists with institutional partnerships, because they bring the training, governance, and infrastructure these projects need. Independent researchers and smaller teams are welcome to apply where the work fits
Institutional researchers
Typical case, expected partnerships
Independent researchers
When this works, what we look for
Research areas we fund
Cards to show areas that are funded, e.g. atmospheric science, cloud microphysics, cryosphere modelling, observational instrumentation, Indigenous-partnered fieldwork, governance and policy research
Our team
Our research is led by atmospheric scientist Dr. Charlotte DeWald and guided by a Scientific Advisory Board of leading experts in Arctic clouds, aerosol–cloud interactions, and airborne atmospheric observations.
Charlotte DeWald
Charlotte DeWald is an atmospheric scientist specializing in ice-nucleating particles, the rare aerosols that trigger cloud ice formation, influencing precipitation and the Earth's radiative balance. She holds a Ph.D. in Climate Science from Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Ryan O'Donnell
A former U.S. diplomat and disaster response leader, Ryan spent a decade working in disaster-preparedness and response operations, as well as co-designing climate resilience initiatives with Indigenous Peoples. He leads ASI’s engagement with Indigenous Peoples, whose lands are directly affected by Arctic climate risks, and the governments and multilateral institutions whose partnership is needed for successful initiatives.
Scientific Advisory Board
The Scientific Advisory Board is an independent group of scientists who advise on ASI's research strategy. Its members bring expertise across Arctic clouds, aerosol–cloud interactions, modeling, and observations. They help align ASI's research with the evidence each stage gate requires.
Dr. Matthew Shupe
Senior Research Scientist, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado and NOAA
Dr. Christina McCluskey
Scientist V, The National Center for Atmospheric Research
.webp)
Dr. Graham Feingold
Research Scientist, NOAA
FAQs
Find answers to common questions about applying and our funding process
What makes a strong proposal?
The best proposals are clear about the problem and specific about the approach. Show us the decision it will inform and why that matters for Arctic climate work. Be honest about what you don't know.
Can independent researchers apply?
Yes. We fund researchers without institutional affiliation when the work is rigorous and the team can manage the project responsibly. Institutional partnerships strengthen most applications, but they're not required.
How long does review take?
The full process typically takes four to six months from submission deadline to funding decision. We notify applicants of the outcome in writing and provide feedback on proposals that don't advance.
What if my institution isn't well known?
We evaluate proposals on merit, not institutional prestige. What matters is whether your team can execute the work and whether the research will actually be useful for decision-making in the Arctic.
Are there restrictions on what we study?
We fund research that informs decisions about Arctic climate interventions. That's broad, but it has boundaries. If you're unsure whether your work fits, reach out before you apply.
Questions before you apply?
Whether you are a scientist, funder, or policy maker, there is work to do.
